He announced he was a candidate on May 11 via Twitter and Facebook (5:14 p.m.): "Today I am announcing my candidacy for President of the United States. You can watch my announcement here. [video]." That evening he discussed his candidacy on Sean Hannnity.
This speech, delivered on May 13 in the state where he served 20 years as a congressman, is effectively his announcement speech. He spoke for just shy of 35 minutes.
Macon Centreplex
Macon, GA
May 13, 2011
[DEMOCRACY IN ACTION TRANSCRIPT Copyright © 2011]
Well
first of all thank you all very, very much. I am delighted to be
home, delighted to be with very many old friends who go back a long
way. You know I was reminded recently of how long I've been doing
this when I went into the American Solutions office and there was a
nice young intern there and I said to him you look very familiar; have
we met? And he said no, but my father was a page for you.
So I look out at a lot of friends here who
go back
for a very long time. I walked in a while ago and saw Emma
Hinsley [phon.] and was reminded that she and I first started
campaigning I think in 1973 together. The only thing I would
disagree with [name] is—excuse me I have allergies and it sometimes
gets a little [inaud.]—but the only thing I would disagree with Randy's
generous introduction about was I suspect most of you, at
least the ones I was talking to getting pictures, don't think of me as
Mr. Speaker. I think most of you think of me as Newt, and I
suspect we ought to keep it that way.
I don't know whether or not we can elect
Speaker
Gingrich, but I'll bet we can elect Newt. [Sneeze, excuse
me] I did decide, Callista and I decided after long consultation
with our family and spending really a year thinking about it, that I
would run for president.
And we made that decision, I think for the
most
profound reason. The United States of America is in trouble, and
it needs every possible citizen to come to its aid if we are to remain
the great center of freedom, the great developer of prosperity, and the
provider of safety to our citizens and to our friends around the world.
And I think the challenges we face are so
large
that it requires leadership of an unusual kind. I don't believe
that any one person in the Oval Office can make a decisive
difference. I believe there are 300 million Americans who have to
be recruited, educated, convinced, led to work together so that all of
us putting our shoulder to the wheel can make a decisive
difference. And I believe the gap between where the people in
this room and the vast majority of the people of Georgia would take
America and where President Obama would take America is so enormous
that this will be the most consequential election since 1860.
I believe we are at a crossroads. Down one road is a European centralized bureaucratic socialist welfare system in which politicians and bureaucrats define the future. Down the other road is a proud, solid reaffirmation of American exceptionalism, an insistence that we hold these truths to be self evident, a commitment that we are all equal and that we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights.
This is the boldest, most radical
statement about political power in
human history. Our Founding Fathers asserted in the Declaration
of Independence literally that power comes from God to each one of you
personally. You are personally sovereign and you loan power to
the government, the government does not loan power to you.
So the first great choice will be between
a Obama administration
which believes that politicians define the future, that bureaucrats
implement the future and that we are merely subjects who are supposed
to do what the government instructs us to do. In a Gingrich
administration, which asserts proudly that we are Americans, that we
are a free people, the power starts at home, is vested in the citizen,
that we are going to enforce the 10th Amendment, that we are going to
shrink government in Washington dramatically and we are going to return
to a country that believes in the work ethic, in opportunity, in
freedom and in every American having a chance to pursue happiness
without being dictated to by bureaucrats, politicians and judges.
Callista and I believe in this so deeply
that
we have launched three parallel projects. We have just
completed a movie, A City Upon a Hill,
which
outlines
in
detail
what
American
exceptionalism
means.
On
June
14th
I'll
have
a book coming out called A
Nation Like No Other, which
outlines for historians, for people who want a deep, in-depth
understanding of what American exceptionalism is, not only where it
came from, why its important, but how you would apply it in policy
terms. And in September Callista's bringing out a book for 1st
and 2nd graders called Sweet Land of
Liberty, which is Ellis the elephant introducing children to
American history by taking them to key events, starting with the
Pilgrims and other events.
And the reason we're doing all three of
these is we want to make
very clear to the American news media, which would desperately like to
avoid this debate, that we're prepared to take on the
pseudo-intellectuals of the left on the core definition of the nature
of America, and we're going to do it not based on conservative
ideology, not based on philosophy but based on the accurate historic
representation of the Founding Fathers and on the concept that we hold
these truths to be self-evident, and so that's going to be a key
centerpoint of our campaign and we're going to say to everyone in
America, of every background, in every neighborhood, of every ethnic
group if you believe in America as a unique place then we want you to
be on our side and we want to work with you to make sure that we
continue to be a special place.
At the same time we're going to say you
know if you really think a
European model where you're passive, subjugated to the bureaucracy,
dependent on the politicians, limited by the political structure, you
have a party and you should be for Obama because that's what he
believes.
I think that if you listened earlier to
Representative B.J. Pak he
gave you a sense of this. And one of the things we're going to
have—I would urge all of you when you go home tonight if you want to
help me, go on an e-mail, go on Facebook, go on Twitter and tell all of
your contacts around the country to go to newt.org—it's really simple,
my first name dot org—and to sign up. It's literally that
easy. And one of the sections that we're going to roll out in
three or four weeks is going to be a section for first generation of
Americans, because I find everywhere I go in the country that some of
the people who best understand American exceptionalism are people who
have come here for the very first time because they've lived the
contrast between American opportunity and what the rest of the world is
like. And B.J. Pak tonight illustrated that, and we're thrilled
and I hope maybe he'll be one of the folks who helps us launch first
generation Americans talking about American exceptionalism, so that
frankly our children can learn.
You know folks often talk about
immigration. I always say that
to become an American citizen immigrants ought to have to learn
American history. But maybe [inaud.] a voting standard that says
to vote as a native born American you should have to learn American
history. Do you realize how many of our high school graduates,
because of decay of the educational system, couldn't pass a citizenship
test?
Now America is a cultural memory.
It's only one generation
deep. And so we stand at a crossroads. If we lose this
fight and we have four more years of radical left-wing values imposed
from Washington this country will be dramatically weakened—the fabric
of our society will be weakened, our economy will be weakened—and we
will be in really deep trouble.
But if we win this fight, particularly if we win it on a principled policy basis, not personalities but policies, the American people faced with these two choices decisively choose a future of American exceptionalism, decisively choose a future of greater opportunity, decisively choose a future with the work ethic, then I think we will do very, very well.
The second thematic, let's just bring it
back home to Georgia, what
would a program of jobs for Georgians look like? What would a
program of jobs for Americans look like? A let me tell you, the
reason I think we have to focus on this is very straightforward.
Because we're a free society America only works when Americans are
working. People have to have a job. The most important
social welfare program in America is a job, and nothing replaces it as
the center of how you get to a healthy country.
I started the day talking to Art Laffer's
conference in
Washington—some of you remember that Laffer invented the Laffer curve
which basically says there's a point in taxation where you start losing
revenue because you raise taxes too much—and I was really struck
talking to Art Laffer. Art Laffer, Jude Winesky, Jack Kemp, a
number of other people including me in the 1970s developed what was
called supply side economics, which is actually a return to general
economics in a pre-Keynsian model. And part of what it said was
if you want economic growth, you incentivize it; if you want more jobs,
you incentivize it; if you want to encourage people to go out and take
risks you incentivize it. And it was a pretty straightforward
model.
In 1980 Ronald Reagan campaigned on
that. Now remember [in]
1980 we had 13 percent inflation, 22 percent interest rates, we were
rationing gasoline every other day based on the last number of your car
license tag, and we were sliding into the worst recession between the
Great Depression and the Obama recession. And at that point
Ronald Reagan came along. All the left-wing intellectuals wanted
to do more of the stuff that was making us sick.
And at that point Ronald Reagan came
along, and he had a program
that's very simple. Dramatic reduction in taxes to incentivize
people economically. Dramatic reduction in regulations to make it
easier to create jobs. And being proud, happy and positive about
business owners, whether they're small business owners, they're brand
new start-ups, they're big companies, but saying you know if you go out
every day and you take the risk and you create a job, I'm proud of
you. Now this is the opposite of the Obama model.
Remember the Obama economic model was
illustrated when he went to
Brazil recently. Having stopped all American drilling for oil and
gas offshore, he had the nerve to go to Brazil and say to the
Brazilians, I am proud that you're developing oil and gas
offshore. In fact, I'm proud that we have loaned you several
billion dollars to buy equipment, by the way for a company owned by
George Soros. And then he showed you how totally out of touch
with the real world he is when he said, we want to be your best
customer. First of all he has a model that says we're going to
borrow from the Chinese to pay the Brazilians. Now that model's
not going to work economically. But second, we need a president
who goes around the world and says I want you to be our best
customer. We need a president who says, I want to sell you
American products.
I outlined this morning, and it will
presently be posted at
newt.org, an entire economic program. I'm not going to go into
all of it in detail, but I do want to share with you the tax component.
First, we freeze all the current taxes so
nobody is faced with the
danger of taxes going up in 2013, because if we do not freeze the
taxes, we will get to an investment freeze about June of next year as
everybody waits to see what the tax code's going to be, and we will
actually increase the likelihood of going into a second, deeper
recession. And if we go into a recession from 9 percent
unemployment, we have real problems.
Second, there are four tax cuts—and I'm
going to be absolutely open
about this, I am looking forward in October of next year to debating
President Obama about it. I am happy to have a long distance
debate with the White House from now 'til then. I stand for tax
cuts designed to increase the number of jobs in the United States by
incentivizing the people who create jobs. President Obama
believes in an America where we make the rich poor in order to get to
equality by leveling down. I believe in an America where we make
the poor rich so we get equality by getting everybody up. It is a
fundamental difference.
And my goal is to get back to where we
were when I left the
speakership. Because we cut taxes, and we had the largest capital
gains tax cut, it was the first tax cut in 16 years, the largest
capital gains tax cut in history according to Art Laffer, we got from
5.6 down to under 4 percent employment about a year after I left
office. Now if we moved from 15 percent, which is the current U-6
number of unemployed, underemployed and quit looking for work, if we
got those folks back in the job market and we got down to 4 percent
unemployment, the number of people you would take off of food stamps,
off of unemployment, off of Medicaid, and you would put them back to
work earning a living, paying their own way and paying taxes, that is
the biggest single step towards a balanced budget that you can take
because you're lowering costs and raising revenue simtaneously.
So as a first step of moving back to
dramatic economic growth I
would have four major tax cuts.
One, the correct capital gains
tax rate is zero. If we had no— Just think about it.
Everybody tells you we're in a world market, and we are.
Fine. Okay so all over the world there are people with capital;
they want to build something; they want to make money for the future,
they'd like to create a new company, they'd like to build a new
factory.
If they woke up one morning and the U.S. capital gains tax rate was
zero, can you imagine how much capital would flow into the United
States in order to create new jobs?
Second, the correct corporate tax rate is
the Irish tax rate of 12.5
percent. The reason goes back to the Laffer curve. We
currently have the highest corporate tax rate in the world. Which
means guess what? Corporations don't pay it. I mean
theoretically this is terrific. You know Obama's up there, he's
really socking it to the big companies. He is so effective at
socking it to the big companies that General Electric last year paid
zero. Now why did they pay zero? Because at 35 percent it
was worth their while to hire 375 tax lawyers, the largest tax
department in the world, gets up every morning at General Electric and
says what are the loopholes to allow us to avoide the taxes? And
I don't blame General Electric; I blame a tax code that is so
destructive that it rewards the behavior of not paying the
tax. So I want to find the corporate tax rate at which they
will lay off the lawyers and pay the government. Because it'll be
cheaper to just pay the tax than it will be to avoid it.
Third, we must go to 100 percent expensing
for all new
equipment. This is a big deal for farmers; it's a big deal
for business. You should be able to write off all new equipment
every year in 12 months and that will— The goal is very
straightforward. We want the American worker to be the best
equipped, the most modern, the most productive worker in the
world. We want the American machine tool industry to have every
incentive to be the most modern and the most effective in the
world.
Here's a great shock. Germany pays
50 percent more for
manufacturing labor than we do, and they today have their lowest
unemployment rate in 19 years because they have a govenment that
actually works on exports. They have a government that actually
favors jobs. They have a government that actually wants people to
go to work.
So one of my pledges is that we will
appoint as the U.S. Trade
Representative a trial lawyer. And we want somebody who has the
right kind of personality that they can fly into Beijing every Monday
looking for a fight. And we simply want to teach the Chinese,
glad you came into the big leagues, now we're going to show you what
the big leagues are really like and we're going to fight for every sale
around the world to maximize American industrial production and
American job production.
Finally, the fourth tax change is to
eliminate permanently the death
tax. One of the things that has always surprised me about
Republican leadership in Washington is that they've never been able to
understand that for my entire adult lifetime, eliminating the death tax
is an 80 percent issue.
People who are never going to pay it hate
it. And they hate it
for the deepest of cultural reasons. First of all most Americans
believe it is just wrong to require somebody to visit the IRS and the
undertaker the same week. They just think its grotesque.
Second, Americans deeply believe that if you work all your life, you
save all your life, you did everything right and your twin brother or
your twin sister did everything wrong, there is something fundamentally
wrong with the government reaching into your wallet the day you die and
taking away half your money to give it to your sister or your brother
in the form of some kind of government program, and they think it's
your money, you earned it, you paid for it with your lifetime work, you
keep it.
There's also a practical job-creating part
of this. You get
some great entrepreneurial figure and they're out here and they create
hundreds of jobs— When I was teaching at West Georgia College,
one of the great joys of my life was getting to meet Roy Richards and
getting to know Roy Richards at Southwire, who was one of the great
entrepreneurs in Georgia history, getting to know Bill Flowers and the
Flowers Industries in Thomasville, great entrepreneurs. You go
around the state, great entrepreneurs. I don't want them spending
the last 20 years of their lives focused with their attorney and their
accountant on tax avoidance, I want them to spend the last 20 years of
their life growing a bigger company to hire even more people to be even
more productive, and that's fundamentally what we've got to get back to.
Now we'll get back to dramatic economic
growth. And by the way
I want to summarize this for you in an easy possible format for you to
go back home and tell your friends and neighbors and all of you in
every single county represented here tonight can take this to every
neighborhood of every ethnic background in your county. It's very
simple. Walk up to the door or go to a local grocery store and
talk to people standing there and just say to them: Would you rather
have food stamps or a pay check? Now if they tell you they'd
rather have food stamps, don't worry about it we know they're liberal
Democrats. But I'll bet you in almost every neighborhood in
America 80 percent of the people are going to say you know I want a
paycheck, I want my kids to have a pay check; I want the freedom, the
opportunity of having a paycheck.
Now why is this important? President
Obama is the most
successful food stamp president in American history. More people
are on food stamps today than at any point in American history and he's
proud of it. I would like to be the most successful paycheck
president in American history. And I'd like the voter, the last
thing before they vote, one of the questions I want them to ask—there
are about three or four questions you ought to ask yourself just before
you vote—and one of them's going to be do you want a future of
paychecks or a future of food stamps? And I believe we win that
argument dramatically.
Now let me also say if you really want
economic growth, you have to
have an American energy policy producing energy in the United
States. The fact is when we developed drill here, drill now, pay
less we were right, they were wrong. And if they had drilled
here, drilled now, paid less in 2008, we'd be paying less in
2011. It's not an accident.
Which gets me to one of the central themes
of this campaign.
My theme is going to be: together we can win the future. The
right policies lead to the right results. And I'm going to argue
that in fact President Obama represents losing the future because the
wrong policies lead to the wrong results.
And the easiest two examples are Detroit
and Texas. If you
want to study job creation, prosperity and a better future start with
Detroit, which through three generations of bad politicians and bad
policies went from 1,800,000 people and the highest per capita income
in the United States and dropped to less than 700,000 people last
year. Over half the houses in Detroit are unoccupied. It is
a catastrophe comparable to a war. Done by— it wasn't a tsunami,
it wasn't a flood, it wasn't an earthquake; it was politicians.
This is a city destroyed by bad policies.
On the other hand Rick Perry— and I can
tell all of you we're very
fortunate, our campaign has Rob Johnson as its campaign manager.
Rob was Rick Perry's campaign manager last year and Perry started the
year 27 points behind Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison and ended the year
21 points ahead. Now I'm not promising you a 48 point swing
against Obama, but it's a nice model to start thinking about. In
Texas where they've had litigation reform, lower taxes, a bureaucracy
that actually encourages businesses to move in, what have they
done? In two of the last four years over half the private sector
jobs in America have been in one state, Texas. Do you think
anybody in Washington is studying Texas? It has all the wrong
lessons: small government, a legislature that only meets every other
year. I mean imagine an America where Congress was only allowed
to come to Washington every other year.
So part of my summary about economic
policy is simple. If you
want a party that's going to try to learn from Texas how to create jobs
in every neighborhood in America, the Gingrich campaign would love to
have your help. If you'd like to join a team that wants to do for
all of America what its done for Detroit, the Obama team need your
help. It's that big a gap, that fundamentally different.
Let me take just a minute and talk about
the third big
program. We're going to talk about American exceptionalism; we're
going to talk about the economy, getting to a balanced budget,
controlling spending, reforming the entitlements. The third thing
we're going to talk about is national security and homeland
security. And let me say about foreign policy, we should have
one. But I'm going to go a step further. We should have an
American foreign policy based on American interests doing what's right
for America.
When the President of the United States
goes to the National Defense
University and makes a major speech explaining Libya by citing the
United Nations and the Arab League eight times and the U.S. Congress
once, you know that he does not have a clue about how to lead an
American foreign policy. And let me be very clear, you know you
think about this. He cites the Arab League. Have any of you
looked at what makes up the Arab League? It's mostly dictators
and monarchs. Now they're important to recognize in the sense of
dealing with the realities of the world, but they're not exactly
authority figures. I mean if you run into me and say you know the
king of this and the sultan of that and the duke of this and the prince
of that have come together and decided we should do x, I have less
interest than if you tell me what five random people at the local
grocery store said. Why would we take seriously a self-serving
group of people who want to manipulate us and use us for their
reasons?
And then you say, but well the U.N.
said. Have you looked at
the United Nations? I looked at the United Nations. The
truth is that George Mitchell, former Democratic Senate Majority
Leader, and I chaired a United Nations reform task force. The
General Assembly is a totally corrupted institution. The
bureaucracy is totally corrupted, and the idea that an American
president would take seriously the directives of the United Nations is
a sign that he just doesn't understand the real world.
So I think we have to fundamentally reset
our homeland security and
our national security policies, building around American interests to
protect American lives, working with those countries that are truly our
allies.
Finally, I think all of us need to realize
that one of the side
effects of the killing of bin Laden has to be a real exploration of our
relationship with Pakistan. I don't know about the rest of you,
but when I learned that after paying $20 billion since 9-11, they had
been housing him in Pakistan for the last 9 1/2 years, I was trying to
figure out what the word ally meant. I know what the word sucker
meant. I mean there is a point where you have to say to people
around the world, how stupid do you think we are? Is there any
person in this room who believes that bin Laden was living in that
place in the town that size for that long and nobody in the Pakistani
government knew it? It's an absurdity. So I think we need
to have a very thorough reappraisal of what our policies are, what
we're trying to accomplish.
Now let me close by, if my good friend Sue
will let me for a minute
here. You all know that long before she became an important
statewide figure, she was the chair of my teachers advisory group in
the 6th district of Georgia when I was Speaker, so we go back a fair
distance. Let me just say, let me just say really candidly, when
I first ran in 1974 as Randy pointed out it was the middle of Watergate
and people said I couldn't win and it turned out they were right, but I
got 48 1/2 percent. I came back and ran in 1976 and Jimmy Carter
was running for president as the Democrat and had a huge turnout and
people said I couldn't win, and they were right; I got 48.3
percent. And I finally came back and won in 1978.
What I want to drive home for a minute,
because it relates directly
to how I hope our presidential campaign will work, if we hadn't had the
South Fulton Republican Women opening the office, we would not have
been able to campaign. If we had not had the Spaulding County
Republican Women opening the office, we couldn't have campaigned.
If we hadn't had the [inaud.] County Republican Women opening the
office we couldn't have campaigned. If we hadn't had Young
Republicans show up from all over the state on the weekends and help us
out, we couldn't have campaigned. I realize in trying to get from
here to the nomination that I'm faced with some very fine people and
that at least three of them could personally write checks for $60
million or more and not notice it. Well I want to report to you
that while we've had a good few years out of office, they ain't been
that good. And furthermore, the kind of campaign I want to run
isn't about somebody writing a giant check. The kind of campaign
I want to run is getting every neighbor, every friend I can to Tweet,
email, telephone, Facebook, walk their neighborhood, talk to their
friends at church, chat with friends they meet with on Saturday morning
for coffee.
And so I would like to directly say to
each one of you, people I've
worked with in the creation and growth of the Georgia Republican Party,
and Lieutenant Governor, I'm so grateful that this has happened,
Commissioner, we go back a long way, my friends from the Congress who
I've served with for so many years—and by the way Jack Kingston and I
did a lot of good work together in the mid-90's and it's a great honor
to be here with him tonight. Austin Scott is doing a great job,
was elected president of the freshman class. Phil Gingrey of
course represents my old district. The nice thing about being
gerrymandered so often in the old days is I have so many friends
represent so many districts that I used to represent, because Speaker
Murphy used to keep trying to get rid of me on the grounds that if he
didn't get rid of me there'd eventually be too many Republicans.
He was right. I just want to say that when we began the campaign
we were very honored. Senator Zell Miller committed that he would
help lead the campaign and be one of our co-chairs. Governor
Perdue signed up and said he would help lead. Governor Deal has
signed up and said he would help lead. I'd like to ask each of
you to consider becoming a leader, not only here but across the
country, helping us reach out, and I want to make this the most fun,
interesting, idea-oriented campaign in history.
And I'll close with this. It's
something I learned from Reagan
years ago. Because you know Reagan used to get attacked all the
time by the New York Times
and CBS News, and he never seemed to notice it. And it was
interesting. I asked him one afternoon, you know what was going
on. I was a very junior member, and occasionally I would get to
meet with the President. I was fascinated with it. He said
look, I represent the vast majority of the American people, I represent
the key principles that have made us a great country, I represent the
ideas that actually work; why wouldn't I be happy? They represent
a bitter minority whose ideas are really destructive and they have no
future. Why would they be happy? So when they're mean and
miserable-spirited, it just tells you who they are, not who we
are. Our job is to reach out happily and I'll close with
this. Just walk around your neighborhood and say, everybody who'd
like to be a classic American seeking opportunity, pursuing happiness,
having a great future; everybody who would like to have a paycheck;
everybody who would like to have an American foreign policy and an
American energy policy, you have a chance to have a great, happy 18
months, and then after we win we'll be even happier.